Sep. 3rd, 2004 01:21 pm
First Cinematic Experience
On Bank Holiday Monday afternoon I did watch some of Bedknobs and Broomsticks. I have a soft spot for this film, as it was the first ever film I saw at the cinema. My dad took me to see it when I was about 5 years old. I have vague recollections of the experience: the huge expanse of the darkened cinema, the vastness of the screen, the swirls of cigarette smoke (hey, it was the 70s) curling in the projected light and not being able to see that well 'cos I was tiny :-)
Older readers, even if they haven't seen the film, will recall the cartoon soccer match in it being a staple of Bank Holiday Disney Time for many years.
So, what was the first film you saw at the cinema?
Older readers, even if they haven't seen the film, will recall the cartoon soccer match in it being a staple of Bank Holiday Disney Time for many years.
So, what was the first film you saw at the cinema?
no subject
I wouldn't put Tarka quite into the worthy wildlife film bracket - it's quite horrible and frightening in places. My grandmother took me and
no subject
Do people still make this kind of lovable animal meets grizzly doom stuff?
no subject
no subject
*cough* vaguely true. The film version did gloss over his homosexuality somewhat! :-)
Googling, I came across this article:
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/08/10/1060454076705.html
which is about a woman who was in a chaste relationship with him for seven years. It's from one of her poems that the title "Ring of Bright Water" comes from. I didn't know that till today!
Terry Nutkin ... worked with Maxwell in his youth
Really? ;-)
no subject
Well all truth is relative isn't it? ;-) But you're right, I should have put 'true' in inverted commas because all I meant to convey was that, unlike Tarka the otter, which is complete fiction, Ring of Bright Water is based on the life of a real person. I wasn't actually suggesting that it was entirely accurate. All of the names were changed in any case, so it's only loosely based on the reality of his life, which may explain the lack of reference to his sexuality. Does the novel make his homosexuality explicit? I haven't read it. It's certainly not really surprising that a film released in 1969 presented its protagonist as heterosexual!